|
|
 | | |
| Neeti July 12, 2006 03:55 AM PDT  Yup! I agree! :) Remember how difficult it is to reduce the timing by even a second in a 1000m track!! | ||
| ||
| | |
| Rujuta July 12, 2006 04:18 PM PDT Nope, i dont agree! remember what hermione said... its easy because you know you have already done it..once! so you should just repeat the performance, nothing more, nothing less:) but i understand! | ||
| ||
| | |
| Aditya July 13, 2006 01:44 AM PDT I agree, mainly because of the way it affects the infinite improbablility drive. I also think its a direct result of the swarm behaviour of the third generation neuron activity triggered by a support vector machine based genetic algorithm in the cerebellum. | ||
| ||
| | |
| Ajay July 23, 2006 07:24 PM PDT The outcome is definitely worth all the effort. Enough of a drive isn't it ?? | ||
| ||
| | |
| Name July 24, 2006 10:23 AM PDT good memories from past may help... hav a look @ http://meghnad.iucaa.ernet.in/~publ/khagol/extracts.html | ||
| ||
| | |
| Mukta July 25, 2006 11:30 AM PDT Hmm...yes being what you were at one time is difficult you have to get most of the parameters needed, back in the range..But you know what I thought that starting afresh clean slate and all is also tough...and if you can do that so easily then you just need to remember that the point in time you want to go back was reached from a clean slate too...So keep at it | ||
| ||
| | |
| Rajeev October 10, 2006 11:20 AM PDT Hey i dont know why but went to the link mentioned above.. http://meghnad.iucaa.ernet.in/~publ/khagol/extracts.html And i think Newton and Aristotle..Not a bad thought at all...!!Considering that in 96 you must be in schools and yet thought of options et al!! | ||
| ||
| Leave a Comment: |